1
Heat
Assisted Magnetic Recording
1.1 Literature
In view of superparamagnetism limit, the magnetic recording system has to
deal with the tradeoff among the signal to noise ratio, thermal stability, and
the head write ability. Just few years ago, magnetic recording is switched from
longitudinal recording system to perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) system to
detain the superparamagnetism limit. The perpendicular recording system
successfully delays the superparamagnetism limit by significantly improve the
write ability of magnetic recording. This allowed using higher anisotropy
media, which is to maintain the thermal stability of the magnetization of the
smaller grains. Current product by PMR, areal density is achieved at about
350Gb/in2. There are some works [1, 2, 3] reported that the PMR is
able to push the areal density up to 1 Tb/in2. But, however, above
this areal density, PMR would again come to the superparamagnetism limit.
To further increase the areal density of magnetic recording above 1 Tb/in2,
energy assisted to write is required. Two major examples for energy assisted
schemes have been proposed are Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR), and
Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording (MAMR).
Cited from: M. H. Kryder, ”Future
Magnetic Recording Technologies”, 2002
|
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of an HAMR recording system. In
principal, HAMR is to use an external heating source to locally heat up the
recording medium before write by the recording head. This heating up the medium
is able to reduce the anisotropy (Ku) of the medium. The reduction of medium
coercivity with medium temperature is shown in figure 2. The normal operation
temperature in hard disk drive without the extra heating source is around 77oC.
For HAMR, the medium need to further heat up to the temperature about the Curie
temperature (Tc) of the medium in order able to write. For example, Curie
temperature for FePt L1o phase thin-film is at about ~650K. Curie
temperature is the critical temperature at which the medium magnetism and the
medium anisotropy field vanish. Therefore, at medium Curie temperature, high
anisotropy media able to be write by the inductive head. Then, the medium need
to rapid cooling down to retain the magnetization orientation had been written.
Cited from: M. H. Kryder,
Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 96, issue 11, 2008
|
Figure 2
Another attraction of the HAMR is
that a very high effective writing field gradient can be achieved with no
required contribution from the magnetic character of the recording head.
1.2 Latest Status of HAMR
In APMRC Jan 2009, Seagate had reported HAMR work successfully in
experiment which can record at a track width of ~50 nm and an areal densities
of ~240 Gb/in2 on high coercivity FePt media [4]. The experiment is carry out
in a system that using the high recording medium (FePt), and a recording head
integrating a pole head and a heating source to heat the medium to its Curie
point at where the data is desired to be recorded. The head was flown over the
FePt media with a Curie point of 650 K rotating as 2700 RPM with a
head-medium-spacing of ~10 nm. Laser with 830 nm wavelength focused to a spot
size of ~120 nm. The data recorded by HAMR is shown by MFM image in figure 3.
Cited from: W.A. Challener, FB-2, APMRC 2009, Grand Hyatt Hotel, Singapore, Jan. 14-16, 2009.
|
Figure 3
1.3 Issues on HAMR
The issues on HAMR can be
classified into two major categories, optical issues and thermal issues.
Optical issues for example, how to produce a nano-sized optical spot (< 20
nm) and with an efficiency high enough to heat the media to high temperature
(300 oC). Furthermore, the way to even reduces the spot size to
achieve even higher areal densities. Since, the media is heat up to high
temperature, this bring out thermal issues. For example, whether the lubricant
layer it is able to withstand the high temperature. Other than these two major
issues, other issues like how to integrating the writing pole head and the
laser source also needed to solve. Certainly, same with other energy assisted
recording approach, high Ku magnetic media with small grain size is demanded to
achieve high areal densities. All of these issues need to be solve in order for
HAMR come into product state. Current research on FePt has Ku about 6-10 x 107
erg/cc with Ms of about 1100 emu/cc and Hk of around 116 kOe and
able achieves grain size of ~3 nm.
Optical Issues
In HAMR, the diffraction limit is
the major obstacle. In conventional far field optic, the diffraction limit for
the full width half-maximum (FWHM) optical spot size d as estimated from scalar diffraction theory is
Where
l
is the wavelength and NA is the numerical aperture of the focusing lens. In
order to have smaller spot size, the laser wavelength should be as short as
possible and the NA should be as high as possible. The current available wavelength
with laser diode is about 375 nm. The NA is the product of the sine of the
half-angle of the focused cone of light and the refractive index of the medium
in which the light is focused. Researcher has proposed a solid immersion lens
(SIL) [5] in which the light is brought to a focus at the bottom surface of a
hemispherical lens. This approach gives NA of 1.8. By SIL approach together
with 375 nm available wavelength correspond to a focused spot size of 106 nm. However,
this spot size is still far away from the 25 nm spot size necessary for
achieving areal densities > Tb/in2 in magnetic recording system.
To achieve areal densities in Tb/in2
range the spot size should reduce and in order the read-back signal is
significant, the fly height (FH) should be low. Therefore, it is both necessary
and natural to employ near field optic in HAMR. The near field optic makes use
of apertures or antennas, or combination of both to overcome the diffraction
limit. But, however it come another issue on the energy efficiency to transfer
the heat to the medium with relative small spot size.
Thermal Issues
Except optical issues, thermal
issues for HAMR are also critical. Since the medium need to heat up above 300oC,
thermal effect on the medium and slider is still have a lot of uncertainty. The
thermal issues on HAMR system can divide into two respects, thermal effect on
slider and thermal effect on medium.
Slider heat absorption can come from
two channels: (1) laser absorption along the laser energy delivery structure
built in the slider (since the HAMR recording head is an integrated head on the
slider, when the laser energy is activated, part of the heat will be absorb by
the slider); (2) the reflected laser heat from the medium (when the laser reach
the medium, some energy is absorbed and some are reflected from medium). This
laser-induced slider temperature rises will cause the sensor sensitivity
changes, the slider deformation, and the magnetic head protrusion; furthermore,
it will cause the fly height unstable [7]. Figure 4 shows the temperature
changes of slider with different laser powers at different rotation speeds.
Cited from: B. X. Xu, et al.,JAP 99, 2006
|
Figure 4
The recording disk use to record
data is constructed by many layers. Instead of magnetic layer, the thermal
effect on other layer for example lubricant layer, soft underlayer, and
intermediate layer need to understand. These would seriously affect the
recording disk robust and recording performance.
Furthermore, the thermal gradient
would cause the transition location changes along the track direction and
cross-track direction. In addition, the thermal erasure on the neighboring tracks
is another serious problem in HAMR. Dr. Xu Baosi has studied on the thermal
profile in medium in order to study the heating effect on the medium [8]. Figure
5 shows the cross-track thermal profiles at 2000 rpm and 3000 rpm.
Cited from: B. X. Xu, et al., JMMM 320, pp.
731-735, 2008
|
Figure 5
1.5 Future Prospect
Combine with BPM
With current available material, HAMR alone is unable to achieve areal
density above 10 Tb/in2. Bit patterned media has predefined domains,
as a medium it behaves as a single magnetic domain due to a strong coupling
between the grains in a bit providing. Thus, BPM approach able to improve the
thermal stability of the media. Current reports have shown that BPM able to
achieve areal density to about 3 Tb/in2 [9, 10]. Figure 6 shows the
achievable areal density by BPM with considering difference thermal stability
energy. Combination of HAMR with BPM is able to push areal density above 10
Tb/in2.
Figure
6: Achievable areal density by BPM
No comments:
Post a Comment