After the establishment
of quantum mechanics, and in accordance with the principle of statistical
physics, the macroscopic properties of microscopic state are determined. The
difference with classical physics is how to express microscopic state of the system?
In classical physics can be simply expressed by position and momentum, but the presentation
of framework in quantum mechanics is changed. Because in quantum mechanics, the
position and momentum cannot both be accurately measured simultaneously.
How to do it?
Represent in wave
functions. Square of the wave function represent the probability of particles
appeared, this is statistical interpretation of wave function. Then, how to get
the electron’s wave function? This is done by solving the Schrodinger equation.
However, solving the
Schrodinger equation is extremely difficult. Except for a few simple system
i.e. Hydrogen atom, Schrodinger equation are difficult to obtain analytical
solution. Thereafter, in order to apply the principles of quantum mechanics,
Hartree and Fock proposed self-consistent field, which is SCF method. Here,
field actually is a mean-field, that is, the potential field where particles in
is replaced by a mean potential field, here included one electron
approximation.
What is
self-consistent field method?
This is no more science,
whose interested can look at the Xie Xide band theory of solids. In general, those
based on the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field is called first principle
methods. This is the first source of the first principle methods, also called
ab initio methods.
Why it is called ab
initio methods?
Because this method which developed based on the principles of quantum
mechanics requires only seven physical constants – the speed of light, Planck’s
constant, atomic fine-structure constant, the electron mass, electron
charge, nuclear mass, and nuclear charge, then we can calculate almost every
properties of materials in ground state.Because not depend on the experiment,
so is called ab initio methods.
In addition, the source said it was from "the first impetus", the religious vocabulary. Newton founded the first impetus, because Newton's first law describes the substance remains stationary or in uniform motion without external force. If the universe was born at the beginning of all things should be static, but had later in the movement, how come it is moving? Newton believed that this is due to pushed of the God, and Newton later years committed to Theological Studies. Modern science believes that universe originated from the Big Bang, but the explosion also need a reason of it. All of these hard to explain things are attributed to "the first impetus" problem of universe.
Science does not believe in God, we do not know "the first impetus" problem is merely because our scientific knowledge is imperfect. The first push certainly caused by some principle. This could be the "first principles." Einstein later years committed to "grand unified field theory" research, it is hoped to find "the first prinple" of all the physics laws, unfortunately, it was the level of science can not reach at that time. Now too far no answer.
(This paragraph is taken from: http: //baike.baidu.com/view/1278387.htm)
In addition, the source said it was from "the first impetus", the religious vocabulary. Newton founded the first impetus, because Newton's first law describes the substance remains stationary or in uniform motion without external force. If the universe was born at the beginning of all things should be static, but had later in the movement, how come it is moving? Newton believed that this is due to pushed of the God, and Newton later years committed to Theological Studies. Modern science believes that universe originated from the Big Bang, but the explosion also need a reason of it. All of these hard to explain things are attributed to "the first impetus" problem of universe.
Science does not believe in God, we do not know "the first impetus" problem is merely because our scientific knowledge is imperfect. The first push certainly caused by some principle. This could be the "first principles." Einstein later years committed to "grand unified field theory" research, it is hoped to find "the first prinple" of all the physics laws, unfortunately, it was the level of science can not reach at that time. Now too far no answer.
(This paragraph is taken from: http: //baike.baidu.com/view/1278387.htm)
Another first
principle designation is derived from the Kohn-Sham method. Because the square
of the wave function is equivalent to the probability of electron appear, then using
probability density of electrons as a variable brought a great convenience. If wave
functions as a variable, for N particle system, each particle described with a wave
function, then would have 3N variables, since each particle has a xyz
coordinates, three degrees of freedom, N particles have 3N variables, N is
generally Avogadro constant magnitude. Difficult to solve! However, if the
electron density is taken as the variable, just to be able to give electron
density at any point, which is actually three variables, i.e., Rou (x, y, z),
Rou is electron density.
Can electron density
to be used as a variable?
Using a 3-dimensional
variable to replace a 3N-dimensional variable will it lose information?
Hohenberg and Kohn
proved two theorems, the density functional theory, the famous H-K theorem of
first principle. Interested go to the website look how to prove.
Theorem along the
following lines: a non-degenerate ground state wave function is the only
function of the electron density; the second is, if the electron density is
determined, then the unique nature of the ground state is determined. Since
then, Kohn and Sham (沈吕九) develop this approach,
called the density functional theory, Kohn received Nobel Prize in Chemistry
for this work. Note: The physicist won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, another is
seemingly physicist Rutherford, the 20th century's greatest experimental
physicist.
In summary, the
first principle is the title of ab initio methods based on density functional
theory, or based on ab initio Hartree-Fock self-consistent field method.
taken from http://emuch.net/html/201106/3227802.html